The IRP has a 20-year forecast horizon and encompasses their
entire service area, including Utah.
From a Castle Country labor market perspective, the IRP is
particularly useful for deriving the utilities’ outlook toward the local coal-fired
power plants. Not only would closure of the generating stations result in a job
loss at the plants, it would also cause losses in the mining sector. The vast
majority of Utah coal is used for electricity generation.Newspaper accounts have emphasized that the majority of power expansion is from renewable energy sources in Wyoming. However, the biggest news in the document is the downward revision in prior forecasts for demand. On average, forecasted system load is down 5.3 percent when compared to the last IRP. Utah demand is anticipated to increase at less than 1 percent annually due to decreased industrial demand and retail consumer efficiencies.
The plan does not anticipate the installation of catalytic reduction equipment in Utah. Avoiding installation of this equipment will save customers hundreds of millions of dollars. It also notes that the EPA requirement to have this equipment installed is currently under appeal in the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The IRP presents the requirement being upheld as a downside risk to the forecast and economic viability of coal generated power in Utah.
Currently, coal accounts for around 50 percent of PacifiCorp’s
generating capacity. While the plan does not contemplate the early retirement
of Utah coal-fired capacity, it also does not envision an expansion. Coal is currently
at a competitive disadvantage to natural gas. Further, there are renewable fuel
mandates in the Pacific coast states. The end-of-life dates for Utah capacity
are given in following table.
County
|
Assumed End-of-Life Year
|
|
Hunter 2
|
Emery
|
2042
|
Hunter 3
|
Emery
|
2042
|
Huntington 1
|
Emery
|
2036
|
Huntington 2
|
Emery
|
2036
|